Cloud Security

Cloud Compliance in 2026: Why 'Lift & Shift' is a Security Risk

Back to Insights

For Irish enterprises in regulated sectors, moving to the cloud is no longer optional. But the "fastest" path—Lift & Shift—is proving to be a compliance minefield. Here is why refactoring is the only secure forward.

The "Lift & Shift" Trap

Migrating legacy .NET applications directly to AWS or Azure Virtual Machines (EC2/VMs) without architectural changes preserves all their vulnerabilities. In a cloud environment, these monolithic vulnerabilities are exposed to new attack vectors that didn't exist in your private data center.

Compliance Failures

Auditors for ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are increasingly flagging "unmanaged VMs" as high-risk. Why? Because patching, scaling, and key management remain manual processes.

Key Insight: True cloud compliance requires "Immutable Infrastructure"—servers that are never patched, only replaced via automated pipelines.

The Solution: Cloud-Native Refactoring

Instead of moving the server, move the logic. By containerizing applications (Docker/Kubernetes) or moving to Serverless (Lambda/Functions), you remove the Operating System maintenance burden entirely.

  • Automated Compliance: Infrastructure as Code (Terraform) documents every permission.
  • Reduced Attack Surface: Short-lived containers give attackers no persistence.
  • Cost Efficiency: Pay only for milliseconds of execution, not idle CPU time.

Conclusion

For regulated industries, "Lift & Shift" is technical debt disguised as progress. The upfront cost of refactoring pays dividends in security, auditability, and sleep.

Audit-proofing your cloud?

We build infrastructure that passes ISO 27001 audits by default.

Audit Your Architecture